ANeither conclusion (I) nor (II) follows.
BOnly conclusion (II) follows.
CBoth conclusions (I) and (II) follow.
DOnly conclusion (I) follows
ANeither conclusion (I) nor (II) follows.
BOnly conclusion (II) follows.
CBoth conclusions (I) and (II) follow.
DOnly conclusion (I) follows
Related Questions:
Direction: Two statements are followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. Assuming these statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statement:
All Springs are brooks.
Some brooks are creeks.
No creek is tap.
Conclusions:
I. Some taps are creeks.
II. No spring is tap.
III. Some brooks are springs
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some chickens are hens.
No hen is an egg.
Conclusions:
(l) No chicken is an egg.
(Il) All hens are chickens.
Instruction: Identify the assumptions that must hold for the statement to be valid, then choose the correct option.
Statement: The advancement of biotechnology has the potential to revolutionize medicine by allowing for the development of personalized treatments, but it also raises ethical questions regarding genetic manipulation and the potential for inequality in access to these treatments.
Assumptions:
I. Biotechnology has the power to create personalized medical treatments.
Il. The ethical implications of biotechnology need to be addressed to prevent misuse.
III. Biotechnology will be accessible to everyone, ensuring equality in treatment access.