Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

★
★
★
★
★
1M+ Downloads

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly

known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

All actors are writers.

Some writers are dancers.

Some dancers are stars.

Conclusions:

(1): Some stars are actors.

(I1): Some dancers are actors.

ABoth conclusions (1) and (Il) follow.

BNeither conclusion (1) nor (Il) follows.

COnly conclusion (Il) follows.

DOnly conclusion (1) follows.

Answer:

B. Neither conclusion (1) nor (Il) follows.

Read Explanation:

Let’s analyze the statements using basic syllogism logic

Statements:

  1. All actors are writers.
    Actors ⊆ Writers

  2. Some writers are dancers.
    Writers ∩ Dancers ≠ ∅

  3. Some dancers are stars.
    Dancers ∩ Stars ≠ ∅

    Conclusion (I): Some stars are actors

  • We only know:

    • Stars overlap with dancers

    • Actors are inside writers

    • Writers overlap with dancers

  • There is no direct or guaranteed link between Stars and Actors.

So this conclusion does not follow.

Conclusion (II): Some dancers are actors

  • We know:

    • Actors ⊆ Writers

    • Some Writers are Dancers

  • But that does not guarantee any actor is among those dancers.

So intersection between Actors and Dancers is not निश्चित (not assured).

So this conclusion also does not follow.


Neither (I) nor (II) follows\boxed{\text{Neither (I) nor (II) follows}}


Related Questions:

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some flowers are snakes. All buttons are cats. All snakes are cats. Conclusions: (I) Some buttons are snakes. (II) Some flowers are buttons.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All mints are papers. All papers are stones. All stones are cutters. Conclusions: (I) : All mints are cutters. (II) : Some cutters are papers
GD 34 is related to HE 24 in a certain way. In the same way, CJ 12 is related to DK 2. To which of the given options is XV 56 related, following the same logic?

Instruction: Identify the assumptions that must hold for the statement to be valid, then choose the correct option.

Statement: Although recent advancements in quantum computina have sianificantly improved processing speeds. the stability of quantum states remains a critical barrier to developing large-scale quantum computers for practical applications

Assumptions.

1. Quantum computing holds the potential for faster data processing than classical computing.

11. Quantum states are inherently unstable, making large-scale quantum computing unfeasible

Ill. Recent advancements in quantum computing have resolved the issue of quantum state stability

The ratio of two numbers is 4:5 and their sum is 180. Find the numbers.