Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly

known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

All actors are writers.

Some writers are dancers.

Some dancers are stars.

Conclusions:

(1): Some stars are actors.

(I1): Some dancers are actors.

ABoth conclusions (1) and (Il) follow.

BNeither conclusion (1) nor (Il) follows.

COnly conclusion (Il) follows.

DOnly conclusion (1) follows.

Answer:

B. Neither conclusion (1) nor (Il) follows.

Read Explanation:

Let’s analyze the statements using basic syllogism logic

Statements:

  1. All actors are writers.
    Actors ⊆ Writers

  2. Some writers are dancers.
    Writers ∩ Dancers ≠ ∅

  3. Some dancers are stars.
    Dancers ∩ Stars ≠ ∅

    Conclusion (I): Some stars are actors

  • We only know:

    • Stars overlap with dancers

    • Actors are inside writers

    • Writers overlap with dancers

  • There is no direct or guaranteed link between Stars and Actors.

So this conclusion does not follow.

Conclusion (II): Some dancers are actors

  • We know:

    • Actors ⊆ Writers

    • Some Writers are Dancers

  • But that does not guarantee any actor is among those dancers.

So intersection between Actors and Dancers is not निश्चित (not assured).

So this conclusion also does not follow.


Neither (I) nor (II) follows\boxed{\text{Neither (I) nor (II) follows}}


Related Questions:

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All almonds are crows. Some peanuts are razors. All razors are crows. Conclusions: (I): All peanuts are crows. (II): Some almonds are razors.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All rocks are pens. Some flowers are rocks. All trees are flowers. Conclusions: (I) Some trees are rocks. (II) Some pens are flowers.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All pots are tears. Some tears are bottles. All bottles are cloves. Conclusions: (I): All cloves are tears. (II): Some cloves are pots.

Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem to beat variance with commonly known facts, and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.

Statements:

All pans are pens.

All pens are brushes.

All brushes are tables.

Conclusions:

I. Some tables are pans.

II. All pens are pans.

III. No pen is a pan.

Instruction: Identify the assumptions that must hold for the statement to be valid, then choose the correct option.

Statement: Despite the unpredictability of future technologies, regulatory frameworks must evolve to preempt ethical crises.

Assumptions:

I. Unregulated technological growth can cause ethical dilemmas.

Il. Ethical standards are often retrofitted to existing technology.

IlI. Regulatory systems can always accurately predict technological outcomes.