App Logo

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads
Right to Property was omitted from Part III of the Constitution by the

A42nd amendment

B44th amendment

C86th amendment

D62nd amendment

Answer:

B. 44th amendment

Read Explanation:

  • The Supreme Court observed that when the incident took place in 1967, the Right to Property was still a Fundamental Right under Article 31.

  • Article 31(2) had mentioned that only after due compensation was paid to the person by the Government, the Government would get the right to take over private property and use it only for public purposes.

  • Article 31(1) of the Constitution had made it clear that private property could not be taken by the Government through an executive order but only through the authority of law.

  • The above laws were preventing the Government from carrying out public infrastructure projects and other agrarian reforms as people started approaching the courts during the land acquisition by the Government.

  • Hence there was an amendment to the Constitution of India in 1978.

  • It was the 44th amendment of the Constitution of India which declared that the Right to Property will no longer be a Fundamental Right.

  • Article 31 and Article 19(1)(f) was completely removed from Part III – Fundamental Rights of Constitution with the help of the 44th Amendment.

  • The Supreme Court reminded the State Government that the State had to follow the authority of law and due procedure of law before taking the private property of a person. This needs to be done as per provisions mentioned in Article 300A.

  •  


Related Questions:

പൗരത്വ ഭേദഗതി നിയമം നടപ്പിലാക്കുന്നതിനായി അനധികൃത കുടിയേറ്റക്കാരുടെ പട്ടിക തയാറാക്കിയ ആദ്യ സംസ്ഥാനം ഏത് ?

Consider the following statements regarding the 52nd Constitutional Amendment Act:

i. It introduced the Tenth Schedule to address the issue of defection in Parliament and State Legislatures.

ii. The first Lok Sabha member disqualified under this amendment was Lalduhoma.

iii. The decision of the presiding officer on disqualification is not subject to judicial review.

iv. The 91st Amendment removed the provision for exemption from disqualification in case of a party merger.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Consider the following statements on procedural aspects of amendment bills:

  1. State legislatures can initiate amendment bills.

  2. No joint sitting is provided for disagreements between Houses.

  3. The bill must be passed separately in each House.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Choose the correct statement(s) regarding the provisions of cooperative societies under the 97th Amendment.

i. The maximum number of board members of a cooperative society is 21, as per Article 243 ZJ.

ii. Co-opted members of a cooperative society board have the right to vote in elections of office bearers.

iii. The term of office for elected board members of a cooperative society is 5 years.

iv. The State Legislature determines the number of board members and reserves seats for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and women.

Choose the correct statement(s) regarding the anti-defection law and cooperative societies.

i. The 91st Amendment amended Articles 75 and 164, and added Article 361B to the Constitution.

ii. The 97th Amendment mandates that cooperative societies file returns within six months of the financial year, including an audited statement of accounts. i

ii. The 52nd Amendment (1985) allowed members who did not join a party merger to avoid disqualification under the anti-defection law.

iv. The 97th Amendment allows the supersession of a cooperative society’s board even if there is no government shareholding or financial assistance.