Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

★
★
★
★
★
1M+ Downloads

Statements: A > B = C, D ≤E < B, F > A Conclusions: I. F > C II. D < A

  1. F > C
  2. D < A

    AOnly I is true

    BOnly II is true

    CBoth I and II are true

    DNeither I nor II is true

    Answer:

    C. Both I and II are true

    Read Explanation:

    Analysis of the Statements

    • Combined Inequality: The given statements are A > B = C, D ≤ E < B, and F > A. Combining these into a single chain gives: F > A > B = C and B > E ≥ D.
    • Full Combined Chain: F > A > B = C and F > A > B > E ≥ D.

    Evaluation of Conclusions

    1. Conclusion I (F > C):
      • Looking at the chain F > A > B = C, there is a clear path from F to C.
      • The inequality signs are >, >, and =. Since > is the dominant operator throughout the path, F > C holds true.
    2. Conclusion II (D < A):
      • Looking at the chain A > B > E ≥ D, we can establish a relationship between A and D.
      • Since A > B and B > E ≥ D, it follows that A > D, which is equivalent to D < A.
      • Therefore, this conclusion also holds true.

    Key Concept

    • In inequality problems, always establish a unified chain if possible.
    • When moving through a chain, if you encounter the same directional sign (e.g., all > or all <), that relationship is definite.
    • If you encounter conflicting signs (e.g., > and <) in a direct path, no definite relationship can be determined.

    Related Questions:

    Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All walnuts are keys. No walnut is a sun. All suns are apples. Conclusions: (I): No apple is a key. (II): Some apples are walnuts

    Read the given statements) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements).

    Statements:

    Some cups are glasses.

    No cup is a plate.

    Conclusions:

    (I) No glass is a plate.

    (Il) Some glasses are not cups.

    Instruction: Identify the assumptions that must hold for the statement to be valid, then choose the correct option. Statement: The discovery of exoplanets in habitable zones around distant stars has provided exciting prospects for the search for extraterrestrial life, yet the vast distances and technological limitations pose significant obstacles to direct exploration. Assumptions: I. Exoplanets located in habitable zones may have the potential to support life. Il. Current technology is insufficient to directly explore exoplanets in habitable zones. IlI. Direct exploration of exoplanets will be unnecessary if we detect signs of life remotely.

    Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.

    Statement : No student of the class X failed the science exam this year.
    Conclusions:
    I.The science exam was very easy
    II. All students of class X passed Science.

    Instruction: Identify the assumptions that must hold for the statement to be valid, then choose the correct option.

    Statement: Although recent advancements in quantum computina have sianificantly improved processing speeds. the stability of quantum states remains a critical barrier to developing large-scale quantum computers for practical applications

    Assumptions.

    1. Quantum computing holds the potential for faster data processing than classical computing.

    11. Quantum states are inherently unstable, making large-scale quantum computing unfeasible

    Ill. Recent advancements in quantum computing have resolved the issue of quantum state stability