Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

★
★
★
★
★
1M+ Downloads

Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem to beat variance with commonly known facts, and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.

Statements:

All pans are pens.

All pens are brushes.

All brushes are tables.

Conclusions:

I. Some tables are pans.

II. All pens are pans.

III. No pen is a pan.

AEither conclusion I or conclusion III follows

BNone of the conclusions follow

COnly conclusion I follows

DOnly conclusion II follows

Answer:

C. Only conclusion I follows

Read Explanation:

Using syllogism logic, the statement chain "All pans are pens," "All pens are brushes, "and "All brushes are tables" implies that some tables are pans, making conclusion I valid.


Related Questions:

Direction: Two statements are followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. Assuming these statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statement: 
Some carnations are petunias.
All petunias are sunflower.

Some sunflowers are not carnations


Conclusions: 
I. Some sunflowers are carnations.
II. All carnations are sunflowers.
III. All petunias are carnations

IV. No sunflower is carnation.

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All walnuts are keys. No walnut is a sun. All suns are apples. Conclusions: (I): No apple is a key. (II): Some apples are walnuts
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All planets are rocks. All rocks are lakes. Conclusions: (I) All planets are lakes. (II) All rocks are planets.
16 is related to 176 following a certain logic. Following the same logic, 21 is related to 231. To which of the following is 33 related, following the same logic? (NOTE: Operations should be performed on the whole numbers, without breaking down the numbers into its constituent digits. E.g. 13 - Operations on 13 such as adding / subtracting / multiplying, etc., to 13 can be performed. Breaking down 13 into 1 and 3 and then performing mathematical operations on 1 and 3 is not allowed.)
Instruction: Identify the assumptions that must hold for the statement to be valid, then choose the correct option. Statement: The discovery of exoplanets in habitable zones around distant stars has provided exciting prospects for the search for extraterrestrial life, yet the vast distances and technological limitations pose significant obstacles to direct exploration. Assumptions: I. Exoplanets located in habitable zones may have the potential to support life. Il. Current technology is insufficient to directly explore exoplanets in habitable zones. IlI. Direct exploration of exoplanets will be unnecessary if we detect signs of life remotely.