Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the qualifications of the Attorney General of India?

i. The Attorney General must be an Indian citizen.

ii. The Attorney General must have been a High Court judge for at least 5 years or an advocate in a High Court for 10 years, or an eminent jurist as per the President's opinion.

iii. The Attorney General must have served as a Supreme Court judge for at least 3 years.

AOnly i

BOnly i and ii

COnly ii and iii

DOnly iii

Answer:

B. Only i and ii

Read Explanation:

Attorney General of India: Qualifications and Role

  • Constitutional Provision: Article 76 of the Indian Constitution deals with the office of the Attorney General of India (AG).

  • Citizenship Requirement: To be appointed as the Attorney General, an individual must be a citizen of India. This is a fundamental eligibility criterion.

  • Judicial or Legal Experience: The Constitution specifies that the AG must be a person who:

    • Has held the office of a Judge of a High Court for at least five years, OR

    • Has been an Advocate of a High Court (or two or more such courts in succession) for at least ten years, OR

    • Is, in the opinion of the President, an eminent jurist.

  • Distinction from Supreme Court Judge Qualifications: While experience as a High Court judge or advocate is specified, there is no direct requirement to have served as a Supreme Court judge. The qualifications are distinct from those required for appointing a Supreme Court judge.

  • Appointment by President: The President of India appoints the Attorney General.

  • Role of the Attorney General: The AG is the highest law officer of the Government of India. Their primary role is to advise the Government on legal matters and perform other legal duties as may be referred or assigned to them by the President.

  • Key Responsibilities:

    • To represent the Government of India in all Supreme Court cases in which the Government of India is concerned.

    • To appear in any High Court in any proceeding in which the Government of India is concerned.

    • To discharge the functions conferred on a counsel by the provisions of the Constitution or by any other law for the time being in force.

  • Tenure and Removal: The Attorney General holds office during the pleasure of the President and may resign at any time. There is no fixed tenure.

  • Comparison with Solicitor General: The Attorney General is assisted by a Solicitor General and other Additional Solicitors General, who also represent the government in courts.


Related Questions:

Which of the following statements is/are correct about the qualifications of the Advocate General?

i. The Advocate General must be a citizen of India.

ii. The Advocate General must have been an advocate of a High Court for 15 years.

iii. The Advocate General can hold a judicial office for 10 years as an alternative qualification.

Consider the following statements regarding the features of the State Finance Commission's report:

  1. The report is submitted to the Chief Minister for review before being sent to the Governor.

  2. The report, when tabled in the legislature, must be accompanied by a document explaining the government's action on it.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

നീതി ആയോഗുമായി ബന്ധപ്പെട്ട് ശരിയായ പ്രസ്താവന ഏത്

  1. നയരൂപീകരണവും പദ്ധതികളുടെ ചട്ടക്കൂടും രൂപപ്പെടുത്തൽ
  2. സഹകരണ ഫെഡറലിസം
  3. നിരീക്ഷണവും വിലയിരുത്തലും

    താഴെപ്പറയുന്ന പ്രസ്താവന പരിഗണിക്കുക: താഴെ നൽകിയിരിക്കുന്ന പ്രസ്താവനകളിൽ തെറ്റായത് ഏതാണ്?

    1. ഭരണഘടനയുടെ ആർട്ടിക്കിൾ 32 , 226 എന്നിവയിൽ എൻഫോഴ്സ്മെന്റിനായി റിട്ട് പുറപ്പെടുവിക്കാനുള്ള അവകാശം നൽകിയിരിക്കുന്നു.
    2. ആർട്ടിക്കിൾ 32 പ്രകാരം സുപ്രീം കോടതിക്ക് മൌലികാവകാശങ്ങൾ നടപ്പിലാക്കുന്നതിനും സാധാരണ നിയമത്തിൽ നിന്ന് ഉണ്ടാകുന്ന ഏതെങ്കിലും പരിക്കുകൾക്കോ നിയമവിരുദ്ധതകൾക്കോ വേണ്ടിയുള്ള റിട്ടുകൾ പുറപ്പെടുവിക്കാവുന്നതാണ്.
    3. ആർട്ടിക്കിൾ 226 പ്രകാരം , മൌലികാവകാശങ്ങൾ നടപ്പാക്കുന്നതിന് വേണ്ടി മാത്രമാണ് ഹൈക്കോടതി റിട്ടുകൾ പുറപ്പെടുവിക്കുന്നത്.
    4. ആർട്ടിക്കിൾ 359 പ്രകാരം ഭരണഘടന അനുശാസിക്കുന്ന അടിയന്തരാവസ്ഥ പ്രഖ്യാപന സമയത്ത് മാത്രമേ ആർട്ടിക്കിൾ 32 പ്രകാരമുള്ള അവകാശം താൽകാലികമായി നിർത്താൻ കഴിയൂ.
      Which one of the follolwing is NOT true of the doctrine of necessity as applied in adminstrative hearings?