AThey have a high guessing factor.
BThey can be difficult to construct unequivocally true or false statements.
CThey allow for quick responses and cover a broad range of content.
DThey discriminate well between students of varying abilities.
Answer:
C. They allow for quick responses and cover a broad range of content.
Read Explanation:
Objective tests
These tests have a single correct answer and can be scored objectively.
They are often used to assess recall and recognition of factual knowledge.
Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs):
These present a statement or question (stem) followed by several options, with only one being the correct answer.
Advantages: They can cover a wide range of content, are easy and quick to score, and can provide diagnostic information by analyzing patterns of incorrect responses.
Disadvantages: They can be time-consuming to construct effectively, may encourage guessing, and might not be ideal for assessing higher-order thinking skills unless carefully constructed.
True/False Questions:
These present a statement, and students indicate whether it's true or false.
Advantages: They allow for quick responses, cover a broad range of content, and are easy to score.
Disadvantages: They have a high guessing factor, can be difficult to construct unequivocally true or false statements, and may not discriminate well between students of varying abilities.
Matching Items:
These involve matching items from two lists based on a specific relationship.
Advantages: They are efficient for assessing associations between a variety of items and are easy to construct and score.
Disadvantages: They may limit assessment to lower levels of understanding and can be challenging to generate a sufficient number of plausible premises.
Completion or Fill-in-the-Blanks:
These items require students to provide a word or phrase to complete a statement or answer a question.
Advantages: They reduce guessing compared to selection-type items and require students to construct their answer.
Disadvantages: Scoring can be subjective and time-consuming, and they may be criticized for encouraging rote memorization rather than deeper understanding.