App Logo

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads
In which of the following landmark judgements, the Supreme Court held that the Parliament could not amend the Fundamental Rights?

AGolaknath and others Vs. State of Punjab - 1967

BManeka Gandhi Vs. State of India-1978

CShankari Prasad Vs. Union of India -1951

DKesavananda Bharathi Vs. State of Kerala - 1973

Answer:

A. Golaknath and others Vs. State of Punjab - 1967

Read Explanation:

  • In the Golaknath case, the Supreme Court ruled that Parliament did not have the power to amend Fundamental Rights. This judgment was later overturned by the Kesavananda Bharati case, which introduced the "Basic Structure" doctrine.


Related Questions:

Which pharma organisation has partnered with Merck KGaA and IAVI for development of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies?
ചൈൽഡ് ഹെൽപ്പ് ലൈൻ നമ്പർ
On Air Force Day, 8th October 2024, the IAF airshow was held in ______?
2025 ഫെബ്രുവരിയിൽ തുരങ്കം തകർന്ന് അപകടം ഉണ്ടായ പ്രദേശമായ "നാഗർകുർണൂൽ" ഏത് സംസ്ഥാനത്ത് സ്ഥിതി ചെയ്യുന്നു ?
In State of UP v/s M/S Lalta Prasad Vaish case in October 2024, a nine-judge. constitution bench of the Supreme Court held which of the following decisions by 8:1 majority?