Who were the prominent lawyers gave up their practices as a part of Non-Cooperation Movement?
1. C. Rajagopalachari
2. Subhash Chandra Bose
3. Mothilal Nehru
4. C. R. Das
AOnly (1 and 3)
BOnly (1, 2 and 4)
COnly (1, 3 and 4)
DAll of the above
Answer:
C. Only (1, 3 and 4)
Read Explanation:
Lawyers who renounced their practices during the Non-Cooperation Movement:
- The Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-1922) was a pivotal moment in India's struggle for independence, spearheaded by Mahatma Gandhi. A significant aspect of this movement was the call for boycotting British institutions, including legal establishments.
- Several prominent lawyers, inspired by the nationalist fervor and Gandhi's call for Swaraj (self-rule), renounced their lucrative practices. This act symbolized a deep commitment to the cause and a willingness to sacrifice personal gain for national liberation.
- C. Rajagopalachari: A key leader of the Indian National Congress and later the first Governor-General of independent India, Rajagopalachari gave up his legal practice in Madras to actively participate in the movement.
- Mothilal Nehru: The father of Jawaharlal Nehru, Mothilal Nehru was a highly successful lawyer in the Allahabad High Court. He abandoned his practice and became a devoted follower of Gandhi's principles, playing a crucial role in the movement.
- C. R. Das (Chittaranjan Das): Revered as 'Deshbandhu' (Friend of the Nation), C. R. Das was a leading lawyer in Calcutta. He gave up his flourishing legal career, inspiring many others to join the Non-Cooperation Movement. He later founded the Swaraj Party along with Mothilal Nehru.
- Subhash Chandra Bose, while a significant figure in the freedom struggle, was pursuing his Indian Civil Service (ICS) studies in England during the initial phase of the Non-Cooperation Movement. He resigned from the ICS in 1920 and joined the movement upon his return to India, but he was not a practicing lawyer who gave up his practice as part of this specific call.
- The boycott of law courts by lawyers was a powerful statement against British judicial authority and a demonstration of popular support for the movement.
